Search for: All records

Abstract While female mate choice is well established, mutual choice may play a larger role in mate selection than currently recognized. Assortative mating is a common form of nonrandom mating in animals that can result from mutual choice. However, few studies address assortative patterns beyond the social pair, potentially overlooking assortativity in the mating pair and in the social environment that shapes reproductive decisions. We asked whether North American barn swallows (Hirundo rustica erythrogaster) breeding in a large colony form pairs, mate (through both within-pair and extra-pair fertilizations), and interact assortatively by ventral plumage color, wing length, and age. Social interactions were tracked using proximity loggers, which recorded close contact between tagged individuals when birds were mating and laying eggs. Barn swallows paired and mated assortatively by their ventral plumage color; however, the assortative patterns in mating pairs were not as strong as they were in social pairs. Barn swallows also interacted assortatively, associating more often with individuals of both sexes who had similar phenotypes relative to the other birds in the colony. Finally, older males and females with darker ventral plumage achieved the highest reproductive success. Investigation of assortative behavior beyond the level of the social pair provides a more complete understanding of mate choice and suggests a mechanism that may maintain the large variation in ventral plumage color in North American barn swallows. 

Abstract Animals in nature seldom use their maximum performance abilities, likely in part due to context-dependent differences in performance motivation. Despite interest in the factors affecting performance expression, the physiological mechanisms underlying variation in performance motivation are poorly understood. We manipulated levels of the biogenic amine octopamine (OA) to test the hypothesis that OA drives motivation to express maximum bite force in male house crickets. We also tested the effect of antenna removal on bite force given prior evidence of potential links among antennaectomy, aggression, and OA. We found that administration of an OA antagonist, epinastine, significantly decreases realized maximum bite force, as does antenna removal. In addition, the performance decrement induced by antennaectomy is abolished by administration of excess OA, and that rescue effect is itself nullified by the simultaneous administration of epinastine. These data show that OA is an important mediator of performance in insects, and thus of performance motivation, and potentially a promising candidate for the short term manipulation of performance. 

Abstract When individuals engage in fights with conspecifics over access to resources, injuries can occur. Most theoretical models suggest that the costs associated with these injuries should influence an individual’s decision to retreat from a fight. Thus, damage from intraspecific combat is frequently noted and quantified. However, the fitness-related costs associated with this damage are not. Quantifying the cost of fighting-related damage is important because most theoretical models assume that it is the cost associated with the damage (not the damage itself) that should influence an individual’s decision to retreat. Here, we quantified the cost of fighting-related injuries in the giant mesquite bug, Thasus neocalifornicus. We demonstrate that experimentally simulated fighting injuries result in metabolic costs and costs to flight performance. We also show that flight costs are more severe when the injuries are larger. Overall, our results provide empirical support for the fundamental assumption that damage acquired during intraspecific combat is costly.